Outcomes Triumph Party Politics
- Janice Thomas
- Oct 4
- 2 min read
Updated: Oct 11
School boards were created to serve communities by keeping students at the center of local decision-making. The role of school boards, under law, is to set goals for student achievement, monitor progress, and hold superintendents accountable. Research shows that school boards, once viewed as nonpartisan bodies, are increasingly influenced by partisan politics, ideological debates, and broader national discourse.
Outcomes v. Politics – A Closer Look
School boards have historically been seen as nonpartisan institutions with a singular focus: ensuring that every student has access to a quality education. In Texas, for example, the Education Code makes clear that local boards hold the responsibility to set student achievement goals, align resources, and hold the superintendent accountable for progress. This structure was designed to keep the focus on outcomes—whether students are reading on grade level, proficient in math, and graduating ready for college, career, or military pathways—rather than on political agendas.
Recent studies, however, show a shift. Research from Brookings, the American Educational Research Association, and other policy groups indicates that school boards, once primarily focused on academic measures, are increasingly influenced by partisan endorsements, ideological debates, and even national political disputes. Voter turnout in school board elections is often less than 10%, which means a small, politically active group can shape results in ways that may not reflect the needs of the broader student population. This has raised concerns that decisions about curriculum, funding, and accountability may be guided more by political alignment than by student data.
The legal framework still expects boards to operate within their defined roles. Texas Education Code §11.151 gives trustees broad authority but also requires that this authority be exercised to improve student performance in accordance with the state’s accountability system. Chapter 39 of the Code outlines how schools are evaluated and how intervention occurs if outcomes consistently fall short. In practice, this means trustees are bound by both state oversight and local responsibility to demonstrate progress in student learning.
For communities, the shift from nonpartisan governance to partisan influence presents a challenge. When board meetings are consumed by political debates, less time remains for reviewing literacy rates, analyzing graduation trends, or planning interventions for struggling schools. Parents and voters can play an important role in keeping the focus on students by asking neutral, outcome-centered questions of candidates and trustees:
What goals for student learning will you prioritize? How will progress be measured and reported?
How will decisions be evaluated by their impact on student achievement?
The future of local education depends on whether school boards can return to their original purpose. While elections and forums will always involve a range of perspectives, the central measure of school board effectiveness remains the same: student outcomes. When outcomes triumph politics, the community gains confidence, schools make progress, and students are the ones who benefit most.
Outcomes Triumph Politics
The role of school boards will always be influenced by a mix of community voices, legal frameworks, and political realities. Yet the measure of success remains the same: whether students are learning and prepared for the future. The Outcomes Triumph Politics - underscores one simple reminder—while politics may influence elections, it is outcomes that define the work of schools. When outcomes triumph over politics, students, families, and communities all benefit.
Companion Blog:
Comments